<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 26 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Research history of vaccines

By Chris Langlois, Vancouver
Published: November 23, 2021, 6:00am

Mask and vaccine mandates are controversial. The basic issue seems to be that the Constitution probably says that children are owned by their parents. Therefore, if parents choose to put at risk the health of their children, their playmates, their teachers and staff, as well as older family members and neighbors, that is their right. The Constitution most likely, somewhere, says that this ownership of children gives parents the right to go against all vaccine science recommendations.

Vaccine mandates go back to Gen. George Washington’s 1777 requirement that his troops get vaccinated against smallpox. Strange that so few of them said, “No way. I’d rather die of the pox than a British bullet.” And where were the anti-vaxxers when doctors Salk and Sabin’s polio vaccines ended the disease that had condemned so many children and adults to paralysis and death?

We have had vaccination mandates for many, many decades. Check out immunize.org/laws, a reputable source. There is both disease-specific and state-specific information. Any parent who really wants to risk their child’s health and life could check out this source and choose which diseases they want to invite into their children’s bodies.

Surely the Constitution allows this. Or does it?

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...