Sunday, August 14, 2022
Aug. 14, 2022

Linkedin Pinterest

Oregon poachers sentenced for slaughtering at least 7 elk

But many question if they received just punishment

By
Published:

In late May, two Hines, Ore., residents were sentenced for their involvement in killing a minimum of seven elk while shooting into the fleeing herd in December 2021.

“The crime left two calves, two cows and a spike bull rotting in high-country sagebrush,” according to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. “Chris Lardy and his wife, Stephanie, were convicted of multiple wildlife offenses on May 20.”

This poaching case made headlines because of the cruelty involved, but perhaps also because of the following unique aspects:

Someone turned them in.

They were caught.

They went to court.

They were sentenced.

The case also raised interest because earlier this year the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made headlines by promising to crack down on poachers who engage in so-called “thrill kills.” The state’s Department of Justice hired a special anti-poaching prosecutor, Jay Hall, to make the point.

When it comes to crimes against wildlife, poaching is at the top of the list regarding public disgust. It is a cowardly act to use a high-powered gun to shoot a defenseless animal.

Many times, the animal killed is not harvested for meat. The animals usually poached are on the endangered species list or are big game animals.

A 2017 poaching case involving residents of Skamania County, Washington, occurred when investigators documented the unlawful slaughter of more than 100 animals including black bears, cougars, bobcats, deer and elk.

“This ranks at the top,” said Capt. Jeff Wickersham, who patrols Southwest Washington’s District 5 for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. “There’s been other violations across the state where you have a small group of people that unlawfully take and poach a number of animals. But we’ve never seen anything like this.”

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife ultimately arrested 20 individuals. Some of the suspects had prior unlawful hunting convictions and faced Class C felonies that carry a penalty of up to five years in jail and a $10,000 fine.

One of the 20 people arrested in the case was sentenced and pleaded guilty to second-degree illegal hunting of big game in Skamania County Court. He was sentenced to 14 days community service and a $500 fine.

The primary suspect in the Washington case was sentenced to only one year in prison; another major poacher served just 23 days in home confinement.

Something is wrong with the criminal justice system and wildlife cases.

Sentence structure

In the recent Harney County elk poaching case, the main perpetrator was required to write and publish an apology letter in the Burns Times-Herald as part of his sentence, which also included six days in jail, 18 months of bench probation and a three-year prohibition from hunting activities, including as an observer or mentor.

In addition, the pair must take hunter education courses to regain hunting rights following their three-year suspensions.

And they will pay a combined $2,500 in fines and restitution.

“The plea offer proposed went through a number of revisions,” prosecutor Jim Carpenter told Columbia Insight via email. “Initially I had asked for a substantially higher sanctions.

“When proposed to the Oregon State Police, per their request, I reworked my offer in consideration of their views prior to sending it to defense counsel. The court followed my recommendation with the exception of the jail time. I had not recommended jail time.”

Carpenter, the district attorney for Grant County, was designated as a special deputy district attorney for Harney County for the case. Though he was the sole prosecutor for the case, he was assisted by the DOJ’s special anti-poaching prosecutor Jay Hall.

“Mr. Hall was instrumental in assisting with this case, particularly in the area of fines being recovered by the department of wildlife, similar to restitution,” said Carpenter. “Mr. Hall also provided much of the charging language in the charging document, tailored specifically to this case.”

How does the sentence compare with previous sentences for poachers?

“The sentence is within local customary norms, with the exception of the jail time,” said Carpenter. “Jail time had not been imposed in a game case in the 24th Judicial District for as long as I can remember.”

If you’re a wildlife advocate, you might be upset with the lax verdict, yet at least penalties were handed down.

As Columbia Insight reported in May, at least in Oregon, with new legislation to increase fines and incentives to report wildlife crimes, we can hope poachers may be the ones in peril.

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...