But the law didn’t exactly say how to do that.
That created a problem when Alex and Alexandra May bought a home in a Spokane neighborhood in 2017 with a deed subject to what appeared in the public record, which included the racist covenants even though a previous owner took steps to have them declared void.
May went to court to get the language removed. Spokane County Auditor Vicky Dalton said she didn’t have the authority to remove something from the public record. The trial court agreed with Dalton, as did two of three appeals court judges and, in March, the state Supreme Court.
Before the state Supreme Court ruled, however, the Legislature passed a law saying property owners can obtain a court order removing the language, have the revised document filed in the public records with a notation that the original document was corrected, and the original document held separately, either at the county or the state archives.
That 2021 law strikes a balance between keeping a historical record of racism and allowing property owners to remove the repugnant covenants from their titles, the unanimous court said. Removing all trace of the covenants would not eradicate discrimination but merely the evidence discrimination existed.
“We must ensure that future generations have access to these documents because, although the covenants are morally repugnant, they are part of a documented history of disenfranchisement of a people,” the court said. “It is our history.”
Last week, the House Local Government Committee got an update on efforts by a special commission to accomplish the Legislature’s goals. James Gregory, a University of Washington history professor, said people at UW and Eastern Washington University are working on a website that would help property owners research whether their legal documents include such language.
They have as many as 20,000 digitized records for King County properties and 5,000 for Pierce County. But the bad news is that most of the more than 6 million property records in Washington are not digitized, including many from 1930 to 1950, a prime time for attaching racist covenants to property being developed.
Eventually, a property owner will be able to type an address into a website and see deeds and covenants for that property. If any document includes discriminatory language the homeowner wants removed, they will be able to file a request online, make an appointment to have it notarized for free and have the change filed, said Phil McBride, a Realtor who is a member of the commission. Amazon is helping with the website, which he said will eventually be available free to other states and cities also looking to address racist covenants.
Although the 2021 law gives county auditors the authority to adapt, remove or redact racist language, the state still needs procedures for doing that, Dalton, who is also a commission member, told the House committee. A group established by a separate law is working on those procedures, which will eventually go to the secretary of state for final approval.
Even with these obstacles, the Washington law is “the best in the country,” Gregory said. It may become a model for other states and cities looking to remove racist language from their property records.