<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Sunday,  May 19 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
 

Letter: Natural gas pipeline is beneficial

By Ann Donnelly, VANCOUVER
Published: April 13, 2023, 6:00am

Don Steinke (“Phase out natural gas,” Our Readers’ Views, April 9) noted that 70 percent of our natural gas comes from Canada, as an argument against continued partnership with Northwest Natural Gas. But he has actually raised one of the advantages of our state’s natural gas supply.

The region’s interstate pipeline, Northwest Pipeline, is uniquely bidirectional, capable of taking wholesale gas from either the north (Canada) or the south (the Rockies, California, the San Juan Basin). No region in the U.S. has better access to abundant, competitively priced natural gas. So, to writer Steinke’s point, the reason customers here get mostly Canadian gas is that it is the most competitively priced. But if gas from southern and eastern U.S. sources is cheaper due to market conditions, it will flow to our gas distributing utilities, such as to Northwest Natural Gas.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...