Attorneys for the Coxes argued at trial that an award of $5 million for each minute of the boys’ “conscious pain and suffering” would be appropriate, and DSHS didn’t argue for an alternative, the appellate opinion said.
“All the jury had was the evidence, their human experience, and the suggested range by the Coxes’ counsel,” Veljacic wrote in the opinion, signed by judges Anne Cruser and Bradley Maxa.
The last page of the appellate opinion says in part: “… there is nothing in the record unmistakably showing the jury’s verdict was based on some improper consideration instead of the legally sufficient evidence. Thus, in setting aside the damages verdict, the trial court intruded on the jury’s constitutional prerogative, and impermissibly based its decision on the size of the verdict and its own subjective reweighing of the evidence.”
Attorneys Ted Buck, Anne Bremner and Evan Bariault represented the Coxes at trial.
“Chuck and Judy Cox have been on a 12-year mission for justice for Charlie and Braden,” the attorneys said in a statement Tuesday. “This road has been long and emotionally exhausting for them, their family and those who cherished Susan, Charlie, and Braden. On behalf of Chuck and Judy, we appreciate the thoughtful consideration of the court of appeals, and hope that with this decision, the State will finally acknowledge its failures so that a better system may emerge to protect our children when in the custody of the state.”
The Department of Children, Youth and Families, the state agency that oversees child welfare today instead of DSHS, did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday about the opinion.