<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Sunday,  April 28 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Nation & World

Australia’s High Court dismisses Russia’s bid for injunction to halt its embassy’s eviction

By ROD McGUIRK, Associated Press
Published: June 26, 2023, 8:05am
2 Photos
THIS CORRECTS THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S NAME TO MCGUIRK - An unoccupied building, left, sits on the grounds of a proposed new Russian embassy, across from another building, right, that is part of the Chinese embassy near the Australian Parliament in Canberra, Feb. 28, 2023. Australia's House of Representatives passed legislation Thursday, June 15, 2023, to prevent Russia from building a new embassy near Parliament House on security grounds.
THIS CORRECTS THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S NAME TO MCGUIRK - An unoccupied building, left, sits on the grounds of a proposed new Russian embassy, across from another building, right, that is part of the Chinese embassy near the Australian Parliament in Canberra, Feb. 28, 2023. Australia's House of Representatives passed legislation Thursday, June 15, 2023, to prevent Russia from building a new embassy near Parliament House on security grounds. (AP Photo/Rod McGuirk) Photo Gallery

CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — Australia’s highest court on Monday dismissed Russia’s request for an injunction that would have halted the eviction of its embassy from a site in the capital, Canberra. A man who had been occupying the block in a portable cabin for more than a week in an apparent act of Russian defiance left soon after.

High Court Justice Jayne Jagot described Russia’s challenge of a law terminating the lease as weak.

“I do not perceive (Russia’s) case … to be a strong one. Indeed, it is difficult to identify a serious question to be tried,” Jagot said.

Parliament passed emergency legislation on June 15 that terminated Russia’s lease on the largely empty block on security grounds, because the new embassy would have been too close to Parliament House.

Government lawyer Tim Begbie said that Russia appeared to be applying for the injunction to protect its own security and intelligence interests.

“It’s not just that they haven’t made a compelling case for constitutional invalidity in this application, they’ve made absolutely no case for it,” Begbie said.

Russia’s lawyer, Elliot Hyde, had argued that Ambassador Alexey Pavlovsky wouldn’t have confidence in the integrity and security of a consular building already on the site, if the embassy isn’t allowed to maintain possession until the challenge to the lease’s termination is decided.

Hyde said that a man who had been living on the site since at least last week was a security guard protecting the compound. The man had been described in the media as a Russian diplomat.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that he welcomed the High Court’s decision and expected the Russians to leave the site.

“The court has made clear that there is no legal basis for a Russian presence to continue on the site at this time, and we expect the Russian Federation to act in accordance with the court’s ruling,” Albanese told reporters.

“Australia supports the law. Russia has not been real good at upholding the law in recent times,” Albanese added, referring to the invasion of Ukraine.

The security guard left the fenced compound after the decision and didn’t say anything to reporters as he walked out the gate. He was carrying bags and was collected by a car with diplomatic license plates.

Stay informed on what is happening in Clark County, WA and beyond for only
$9.99/mo

The Russian Embassy didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Russia had accused Australia of “Russophobic hysteria” for canceling the lease of the site in Canberra’s diplomatic quarter where Moscow wanted to build a new embassy. The current Russian Embassy is in the Canberra suburb of Griffith and its operations are unaffected.

Australian National University international law expert Don Rothwell said that an examination of the published list of accredited Russian diplomats in Australia revealed there were only three male diplomats who could be the man guarding the embassy site.

Given Hyde’s description of the squatter as a guard, Rothwell doubted the man had diplomatic immunity, which could have prevented Australian authorities from removing him from the site.

With him gone, police could avoid any further legal challenge by securing the site and preventing any Russian diplomat from taking his place, Rothwell said.

Australian Federal Police declined last week to explain why the man hadn’t been removed from the contested site as a trespasser.

The legal wrangle over the site is a new low point in strained relations between Russia and one of Ukraine’s most generous supporters outside NATO.

Albanese on Monday announced an additional 110 million Australian dollars ($74 million) in aid to Ukraine that includes 70 military vehicles and features 28 M113 tracked armored personnel carriers. The aid also includes ammunition and AU$10 million ($6.7 million) in humanitarian help for shelters, health services, clean water and sanitation.

The new aid package brings Australia’s total Ukraine aid to AU$790 million ($528 million) since Russia invaded last year.

During the court hearing, Australia’s lawyer suggested that the Kremlin has been distracted from the case by the short-lived rebellion in Russia by Wagner Group mercenaries.

Tim Begbie said that Hyde hasn’t replied to a letter sent Saturday in which the government tried to head off the injunction request by offering not to damage the consular building or lease the site to anyone else while the Russian challenge is before the court.

“I don’t criticize my learned friend for not having responded to this letter,” said Begbie, referring to Hyde. “Russia has had other things on its mind over the weekend.”

Loading...