The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
Beginning last fall, Donald Trump’s campaign has been on an effort to change the rules of the delegate selection process to make it easier — and faster — for the front-runner to lock up the nomination.
Never has this been more critical, as the former president faces 91 counts in four different states and the prospect that trial proceedings could interrupt his march to the nomination. He was in California last week, not only to woo voters but also to thank the party for changing the rules so that if he wins a majority in the primary, he also wins all of the state’s delegates to the convention.
Back in 2016, Trump’s people got outflanked in key states by Ted Cruz, who managed to secure more delegates even in states where Trump beat him because of the way the rules were structured.
That won’t happen this time around, according to Ben Ginsberg, one of the nation’s top election lawyers. “Despite a large number of candidates, only the Trump campaign did the grunt work of talking to state parties to try and get them to meld their rules to Donald Trump’s favor,” he said.
The Supreme Court has ruled that political parties control the rules for nominating presidential candidates. The Trumpers have been working the system since 2019, managing to convince state parties to either move to winner-take-all systems (which reward frontrunners) or to party caucuses rather than primaries, which are controlled by insiders who Trump has actively courted.
The convention rules provide that delegates, with few exceptions, are “bound” by the results of the primaries and caucuses for at least one round of balloting, unless the candidate drops out of the race.
According to Ballotpedia, there will be an estimated 2,467 delegates at next summer’s Republican convention: 2,363 pledged delegates and 104 unpledged. Does that mean that delegates cannot vote their conscience? What happens when intervening events change the dynamic of the race?
In 2016, in what was seen as an effort to stop Trump, then Rules Committee member Curly Haugland argued that under the rules, delegates should be free to vote their consciences and not to be bound by the votes in state primaries and caucuses.
In 1980, Democrat Ted Kennedy made the same argument in an effort to stop the nomination of Jimmy Carter. The nomination was effectively decided on the first night of the convention, when delegates rejected the effort to change the rule that bound delegates. The convention is the highest authority of both parties; it makes the rules and can change the rules.
I cut my teeth on that campaign, writing speeches about why a robot rule should not control the convention. What if the prospective nominee committed a crime between the primary and the convention, we asked. What if he were convicted of one? In 1980, it was a rhetorical question. In 2024, this summer in Milwaukee, it may not be rhetorical at all.
Morning Briefing Newsletter
Get a rundown of the latest local and regional news every Mon-Fri morning.
Support local journalism
Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.
Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.
