<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Saturday,  May 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
 

Letter: 12-step programs are successful

By William McCreery , VANCOUVER
Published: October 12, 2023, 6:00am

I have a different take on 12-step programs than Mr. Kowalski (“Be smart about drug policy,” Our Readers’ Views, Oct. 4).

In rare occasions a judge might sentence a DUI case to Alcoholics Anonymous. Would he do that if he felt the program didn’t work? Columbian advice columnist Annie Lane often recommends AA or Al-Anon (those bothered by someone else’s drinking) to go to those 12-step meetings. Would she do that if she thought they didn’t work?

People go to 12-step programs because they choose to. They aren’t forced to go. Many who aren’t attending could benefit by being involved. Twelve-step programs are spiritual, not religious. They talk about embracing a higher power, something greater than yourself.

These and other 12-step programs have existed for decades and they work. There are millions of sober alcoholics, and those bothered by someone’s else’s drinking or drug use that attribute their success to 12-step work.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...