Crisp: Elements best left unexamined

An injured player who gives the crowd a thumbs up as he is carted off the field garners a great cheer from the fans, reflecting either their gratitude or their relief at the illusion that everything is fine and the game can go on. Which it soon does.

But most of football’s damage is invisible to the fan in the stands. It occurs among the thousands of unseen players who sustain injuries of various severities, many of which will affect them for their lifetimes. Some players are paralyzed and a few die every year. These stories don’t linger on the sports pages.

And in recent decades we’ve learned about chronic traumatic encephalopathy, the consequence of hard blows to players’ brains or of repetitive sub-concussive blows. Some evidence indicates a staggering prevalence of CTE in professional football players, which results in devastating effects long after the fans have moved on to other players.

We rationalize the damage that football does to its players in various ways: They choose to play the game. They’re well paid. They love football.

But these dubious pretexts ignore our complicity in the creation of the incentives that motivate football players to risk their lives and health, and they dodge the issue of whether the players’ willing participation in the game absolves us of the damage they suffer.

In fact, football requires from its fans considerable denial about the harm the game does to its players.

That’s why Matthew Walther’s column in the New York Times last week was a refreshing dose of candor. Walther argues against a new National Football League rule that permits a fair catch on a kickoff between the goal line and the 25-yard line. The hope is that it will result in fewer runbacks and therefore less damage to players during one of football’s most dangerous plays.

Walther calls this “a terrible idea” that threatens “the ethos of blue-collar toughness that once defined this great game.” He argues the virtues of the kickoff and minimizes the dangers it presents for players. He agrees with Cardinals fullback Ron Wolfley that football “by definition cannot be safe.”

Walther evokes “our classical inheritance,” picturing football as “stylized warfare between city-states” and endorsing its “encouragement of a quasi-pagan fatalism in the face of defeat.” He says that Homer “captured the spirit of the NFL when he dismissed mortality as beneath the concern of the great-souled.”

Homer said: “Even as are the generations of leaves, such are those also of men. As for the leaves, the wind scattereth some upon the earth.”

I’m not persuaded by Walther’s evocation of the classic tradition — after all, football is just a game — but I appreciate his honesty. Homer seems to be saying that we humans are all just leaves; eventually we’ll all fall off the tree. If some leaves are scattered by the wind more quickly than others, so what?

One wonders if this casual dismissal of the value to each individual life is too fatalistic. But we’ll think about that after the game. Or not.