<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Saturday,  May 4 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Is a debt limit constitutional?

The Columbian
Published: August 3, 2011, 5:00pm

The first business of the House of Representatives in 2011 was to read the U.S. Constitution. It was a laudable effort, even though they left parts out. Which member or members read the 14th Amendment? It would appear that the Republican leaders should take a look at Section 4 again: “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for the payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion shall not be questioned. But neither the United States or any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States.” It would appear that failure to pay the public debt is a violation of the 14th Amendment. In light of this amendment, perhaps the “debt limit” is actually unconstitutional.

Hugh Shuford

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...