<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Monday,  April 29 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Contrasting views about torture

The Columbian
Published: May 17, 2011, 12:00am

E. Bruce Preece’s May 13 letter, “Efforts of Bush years led to capture,” and Sen. John McCain’s, R-Ariz., account in the page A3 story, “McCain: Torture didn’t lead to finding bin Laden,” present two contrasts about the results of “enhanced interrogations,” also known as torture.

Preece is lavish in his praise for the work of the Bush administration in its use of “enhanced interrogations,” as in his view, this led to the capture of Osama bin Laden. He joins former members of the Bush administration who endorse the use of those techniques in gaining information needed to capture or kill bin Laden.

McCain says that “enhanced interrogations” do not work, as he was tortured by the North Vietnamese to seek information about U.S. policies, plans and personnel. He says plainly that it only led to false information. When he was “interrogated,” he gave out the names of the Pittsburgh Steeler football team to get the interrogators to stop the torture.

McCain was also insistent that the Bush policies did not produce information that led to bin Laden’s death. He also said that the CIA told him that the information needed to kill or capture bin Laden did not come from the “enhanced” methods.

Whom do you believe?

Hugh Shuford

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...