<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Sunday,  May 19 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
 

Letter: No need for high-capacity clips

The Columbian
Published: January 16, 2013, 4:00pm

Guns have three purposes: target shooting, hunting and killing people.

As a young man, my father made me hunt with a single-shot rifle, saying that a competent hunter only needs one shot. No skilled hunter needs more than five shots and the best target guns are all single shots.

So the only use of a high-capacity magazine is to kill people — or satisfy a big ego.

When I was young, there were few semi-automatic weapons. We hunted with guns that had to be cocked or reloaded with each shot. If we had laws restricting magazines to five shots or guns that had to be cocked between shots, it would be difficult for a gunman to take down scores of people before someone tackled him.

While other new laws are necessary, this would not have any effect on law-abiding hunters and target shooters — it only reduces military type carnage in our cities.

If you are a true sportsman, you don’t need semi-automatic weapons with high-capacity clips.

Rik Roberts

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...