<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Monday,  May 6 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Bridge issues debated

The Columbian
Published: June 18, 2014, 5:00pm

As the Columbia River Crossing was defeated for a second time, here are a few things that detracted from that bridge: light rail functionality in cold and hot weather, and the two people killed last year by the MAX train. On the other side of the issue, light rail is fast and efficient in getting people to their destinations and in passing traffic that’s at a standstill (on the freeway during rush hour). It’s going to take federal funding to deal with a new bridge, in addition to solving the traffic congestion problems on Interstate 5 and Interstate 205 in Washington and Oregon.

Dale C. Chambers

Yacolt

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...