<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 26 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Columns

Jayne: Shutdown a loser for Trump, workers, nation

By Greg Jayne
Published: January 27, 2019, 6:02am

It all depends on your perspective. Friday, the news was either “Trump caves on shutdown” (CNN.com) or that the president “vows to build wall despite uncertain funding” (FoxNews.com).

While we won’t rehash the details of a 35-day government shutdown that resulted in President Trump getting … well, nothing … we will for a moment ponder one of the underlying motivations for an impasse that left some 800,000 federal workers without paychecks. And imperiled the nation’s air transportation system and food supply and border security. And that led Trump to suggest that grocery stores could just “work along” with people who don’t have money.

After consulting our Trump-to-English translator, we think that means that stores would give customers food in exchange for a promise to pay for it later. We’ll have to try that sometime.

Meanwhile, it remains unclear why Trump’s demand for funding toward a border wall was suddenly urgent. He spent two years with Republicans in control of the House and the Senate, and it wasn’t urgent then. He signed a $1.3 trillion spending bill sent to him by a Republican Congress, and wall funding wasn’t urgent then. His administration engaged in a policy to separate children from their families with no plans for ever reuniting them — and wall funding wasn’t urgent then.

It was only when Democrats took control of the House that funding for a wall suddenly became a national emergency. Which brings us to the underlying point.

One of the core philosophies behind the government shutdown was that government is bloated at best and unnecessary at worst. Remember one of Ronald Reagan’s most famous lines: “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government, and I’m here to help.’ ”

In the hands of Reagan, that philosophy becomes a good-natured quip. In the hands of Trump and in the minds of many of his supporters, it becomes dangerous dogma reinforced by 40 years of repetition.

You might buy the trope that government is the enemy and that a shutdown is a means to an end — reducing the size of the federal government. And we might believe your sincerity if Republicans had not ballooned the deficit last year. Reminder: Those precious tax cuts were coupled with an increase in spending (both of which were supported by Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Battle Ground). The federal deficit is expected to approach $1 trillion this year, and the debt is about $22 trillion. And still, conservative mantra promotes smaller government and the notion that government is either bad or incompetent.

Neither of which is true. During the shutdown, there were reports of national parks being trashed; national monuments were closed to visitors; and the air transportation system would have come to a halt if “essential” employees had not been required to work without pay.

Those are the obvious effects. Less noticeable but no less important: The Small Business Administration stopped approving routine loans; Environmental Protection Agency inspections stalled; and the E-Verify system that checks if potential employees are in the United States legally was shut down. But, wait, there’s more: Food and Drug Administration inspections of low-risk facilities were halted; the FBI stalled interviews of child victims in sexual assault prosecutions; and initial public stock offerings for companies stopped. The list of minor government functions that we might not be aware of but which impact our lives — as compiled by Vox.com — is extensive.

Meanwhile, Trump’s own advisers admit the shutdown had a more deleterious impact on economic growth than they initially predicted.

All of which adds up a pointless and counterproductive shutdown that did not yield the results Trump desired. But it might have served as a reminder that an efficient government is essential to civilization. But that probably depends on your perspective.

Loading...