<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Saturday,  May 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
 

Letter: There’s more to statue story

By Mark Monroe, Vancouver
Published: July 15, 2021, 6:00am

This letter is in regard to Michael Schrader’s letter to the editor “Preserve Lewis and Clark legacy” (Our Readers’ Views, July 13).

Mr. Schrader appears to be a proponent of providing disinformation in order to rile up people. Mr. Schrader failed to mention, in his rant-filled letter, that Sacagawea, the famous Native American woman, was also part of this monument.

The statue was not removed because of racial hatred, as Mr. Schrader claims. The statue was removed because the statue is of two white men — Meriwether Lewis and William Clark — and Sacagawea, who was depicted tracking, according to historians. Those against the statue have said Sacagawea appears to be cowering.

I suggest Mr. Schrader do some research on the story, which doesn’t mean reading Facebook blurbs or listening to Fox News. I would suggest to Mr. Schrader that he actually review a picture of the statue, but I have a hunch it won’t matter to this man.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...