<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Sunday,  April 28 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: There’s value in being uncommitted

By Joe Kooijman, Vancouver
Published: March 9, 2024, 6:00am

Much has already been written about the protest movement by Michigan Democratic voters to vote “uncommitted” in their recent presidential primary. The Washington primary also has this option (at least for Democratic voters). What would (or should) be the consequence if one selects this option? If enough people select it, the Democratic Party should send a commensurate number of “uncommitted” delegates to the national convention.

In 2020, Washington was entitled to 109 delegates, 20 of which were “unpledged” delegates (also often called “superdelegates” as they were selected from the congressional delegation and the governor). The remaining 89 “pledged” delegates were proportionally allocated according to the election result. In 2020, the “uncommitted” vote was only 0.4 percent, so there was no “uncommitted” delegate.

Uncommitted delegates may be useful at the convention as they are not pledged to a particular candidate (despite the fact that they will be part of the “pledged” contingent), to help break a deadlock, or in case the plurality candidate becomes incapacitated (as is not completely impossible with a geriatric candidate like Joe Biden). So voting “uncommitted” is not necessarily a waste of your vote.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...