Washington tax dollars go to dry cleaning, art

Rivers, Moeller, Benton among lawmakers reimbursed for such expenses

By

Published:

Updated: January 30, 2013, 8:30 AM

 

Related story

Lawmakers rack up hefty cellphone bills

Lawmakers reimbursed for dry cleaning expenses

Seven Democrats and 12 Republicans in the Legislature requested and received compensation totaling more than $5,600 for dry cleaning since the start of 2011. Here’s a breakdown of the lawmakers and how much they were reimbursed:

Rep. Ann Rivers, R-La Center: $519.18

Sen. Curtis King, R-Yakima: $511.27

Rep. Gary Alexander, R-Olympia: $509.92

Rep. Brad Klippert, R-Kennewick: $480.02

Rep. Jim Moeller, D-Vancouver: $448.40

Rep. Mike Armstrong, R-Wenatchee: $439.62

Sen. Sharon Nelson, D-Vashon Island: $407.29

Sen. Val Stevens, R-Arlington: $323.24

Sen. Brian Hatfield, D-Raymond: $320.28

Sen. Tim Sheldon, D-Potlatch: $320

Rep. Glenn Anderson, R-Fall City: $265.19

Rep. David Taylor, R-Moxee: $246.64

Rep. Bill Hinkle, R-Cle Elum: $234.26

Sen. Maralyn Chase, D-Shoreline: $184.15

Rep. Cathy Dahlquist, R-Enumclaw: $182

Rep. Chris Reykdal, D-Tumwater: $83.32

Sen. Don Benton, R-Vancouver: $72

Rep. Tina Orwall, D-Des Moines: $35.97

Sen. Janea Holmquist Newbry, R-Moses Lake: $28

Anderson, Armstrong, Hinkle and Stevens recently left the Legislature. Rivers is now in the state Senate.

OLYMPIA — A few days after Washington lawmakers approved a budget deal to lower state spending last year, small-government Rep. Gary Alexander got $40.60 worth of dry cleaning done.

Then he made sure taxpayers paid the bill.

Alexander, the Republican budget writer in the state House, billed more than $500 worth of dry-cleaning fees to the state over the past two years, according to an Associated Press analysis of thousands of expense reimbursements. He wasn’t alone: Seven Democrats and 12 Republicans in the Legislature requested and received compensation totaling more than $5,600 for dry cleaning since the start of 2011.

Lawmakers are able to get taxpayer-covered compensation for what the Legislature deems legitimate business expenses tied to the job. That includes common costs of being a lawmaker, such as travel around the district to meet with constituents, parking fees for meetings, office supplies and rent for district offices.

It also includes a variety of expenses with less-explicit benefits for taxpayers, including iPhones, picture frames, artwork, expenses for meetings with lobbyists and dues to professional organizations like the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council.

Alexander said he only submits dry-cleaning receipts that are above and beyond the expenses he has outside of his legislative work. He said the job, especially when the Legislature is meeting, requires him to use a lot more dress shirts and sport coats.

“I don’t think that’s an unreasonable expense to be reimbursed for,” Alexander said.

After an AP reporter questioned him about how it aligns with a limited-government message, Alexander said he would explore ways to keep his expenses down.

“I’m always looking for ways that we can do it by example,” said Alexander, who is from Olympia.

Stephen Ellis, vice president of the group Taxpayers for Common Sense, said the idea that lawmakers should spend public money to decorate their office or keep their clothes clean is beyond the pale. He said that while the amount of money may be small in comparison to the budget at large, the expenses offer a chance for taxpayers to get a glimpse at how lawmakers operate.

“We see it as a lens into how they approach the budget,” Ellis said. “If they’re profligate with their own spending in offices, it stands to reason that they’re not going to be too frugal with the state or the federal budget.”

Rep. Jim Moeller, D-Vancouver, spent nearly $450 on dry cleaning. He said dry cleaning is similar to other items he can expense, such as food or lodging, while the Legislature’s in session.

“While we’re here, this is our uniform, basically,” Moeller said, adding that he only charges his dry-cleaning bills to the state while he’s working as a legislator.

Sen. Ann Rivers, R-La Center, tops the AP's list of dry-cleaning expenses since the start of 2011. Rivers, who charged $519 for dry cleaning, said Wednesday that out of several reimbursements she's allowed to charge the state, she only asks to be reimbursed for her mileage and her dry cleaning during the session.

Those other allowable expenses include in-state airfare, shipping, conventions related to the Legislature, office supplies, meals and lodging.

"We're expected to wear a suit every day," Rivers said. "After a while the dry cleaning piles up. ... You should look nice and you should smell nice and you should be doing the work of the people."

Sen. Don Benton, R-Vancouver, did not return a call from The Columbian on Tuesday. He was reimbursed $72 for dry cleaning.

Democratic Sen. Rodney Tom, who lives in the wealthy enclave of Medina and recently built a coalition with Republicans to install himself as majority leader, purchased various books from Amazon.com and got reimbursement for a Bose headset that cost $164.20. Senate Democratic Leader Ed Murray got coverage for his home Internet ($50 per month) and home office telephone ($50 per month), in addition to the cellphone that he and many other lawmakers expense.

House Republican Leader Richard DeBolt, of Chehalis, filed for only about $100 in total expenses over two years — all tied to travel. House Speaker Frank Chopp, D-Seattle, used his account mostly to expense costs related to his district office.

Rep. Larry Haler, R-Richland, expensed more than $600 in membership dues for business organizations in the Tri Cities. Rep. Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, purchased $383.25 in artwork for his office in March of last year, also when lawmakers were struggling to balance the budget.

Pedersen said the art — a painting of the Montlake Bridge done by a Seattle artist — was like other furniture that lawmakers need to make their offices comfortable and inviting. He noted that he doesn’t typically use his full allotment for reimbursable expenses, which has been $6,500 in recent years.

Murray, the top Democrat in the state Senate, said he uses his own money to cover a number of expenses related to his legislative work. He bemoaned the focus on reimbursements.

“It’s why we have trouble recruiting candidates who aren’t rich, old and retired,” said Murray, who is from Seattle.

Haler said he wouldn’t be part of the business organization if it wasn’t for his work in the Legislature. Tom said his expenses were all important to his legislative work, such as books on policy and a headset for phone conversations.

Each lawmaker typically totals between $10,000 and $25,000 in expenses each year, including per diems during the session, postage, printing, travel and the more generic category of office expenses. Legislators earn a salary of between about $42,000 and $50,000, and many maintain external jobs.

Washington lawmakers are currently looking to fill a roughly $1 billion shortfall and looking to add another $1 billion to education in the coming legislative session.

This story has been updated to include quotes from Rivers.