<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Monday, March 4, 2024
March 4, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

I-5 Bridge tolling bill approved by Washington House

By , Columbian staff writer
Published:

A bill authorizing tolling on the Interstate 5 Bridge is nearly to the governor.

The Washington House of Representatives passed the Senate’s toll bill Tuesday night, 57-40, after the Senate passed the bill at the beginning of April.

Clark County representatives voted along party lines, with the two Democrats representing most of Vancouver voting yes and the six Republicans representing the remaining parts of Clark County voting no.

Because the bill was amended in the House, it will go back to the Senate for concurrence before being sent to the governor.

Tolling on the current I-5 Bridge is expected to start in 2026, with daytime rates of between $2.05 and $3.55 per trip being studied by the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program, commonly referred to as IBRP. It is assumed that rates would increase by 2.15 percent annually to keep pace with general price inflation.

Spanning History

A large crowd attended the opening of the bridge in February 1917.Before it opened, those traveling between Portland and Vancouver had to take a ferry.Interstate Bridge: History of conflict, compromise
In late June 1905, Vancouver Mayor E.G. Crawford boarded a crowded ferry from Vancouver to Portland among an excited group. They were heading to Portland’s…
Artwork of the Interstate Bridge the day tolls are removed, which is decorated with banners celebrating it becoming a free bridge, is pictured from a collection at Clark County Historical Museum on Nov. 18.Interstate Bridge toll removal starts new chapter
The greatest impromptu celebration in over a decade consumed downtown Vancouver on New Year’s Eve 1928. Cars waiting in anticipation jammed the streets, undeterred by…
Construction of toll stations starts on the Interstate Bridge.Interstate Bridge: Second span revives tolls
A howitzer boomed and jets zoomed overhead as hundreds of spectators gathered to celebrate the opening of the second span of the Interstate 5 Bridge.

If reinstated, it will be the third time travelers will need to pay to cross the 106-year-old bridge.

Unlike in the past, however, tolls won’t be a relative blip lasting for a few years or a decade, but could be in place for 30 to 40 years, according to IBRP Administrator Greg Johnson.

The reason: 30 to 40 years is the sweet spot time period for bond payments, according to Johnson. The decision about the duration of tolls will be made by the states, not the IBRP.

Program officials anticipate that while the current I-5 Bridge is tolled, it will be toll-free between 11 p.m. and 5 a.m., in an attempt to avoid situations where drivers would pay a toll and experience a construction delay.

Officials are looking at nighttime rates on the replacement bridge of between $1.50 and $2.15 per trip.

Tolling is expected to generate $1.2 billion of the bridge replacement program’s estimated cost of $6 billion, with state and federal funds making up the rest.

Amendments

A handful of amendments were proposed, but only two were adopted, both from Rep. Stephanie McClintock, R-Vancouver.

One would direct the Washington tolling authority to require toll rates that specifically cover the I-5 Bridge without subsidizing other Oregon toll facilities. The other would require that rates on the bridge not exceed the highest toll rate allowed on any of the other toll facilities in Washington.

The highest car toll rate in the state is on the Interstate 405 Express Toll Lanes, with Good To Go! rates of between 75 cents and $10, however, other lanes are free. The highest full lane car toll rate is on the Tacoma Narrows Bridge at $4.50. If drivers don’t have a Good To Go! pass and account, a $2 fee will be added to the toll cost and mailed to them.

“I’m happy these two amendments were accepted to make this policy better by inserting some guardrails to protect Washingtonians,” McClintock said in a press release. “However, the constituents in the 18th District that I represent are not supportive of tolling, which makes me a no vote on this bill.”

Rep. Greg Cheney, R-Battle Ground, offered an amendment allowing Washington residents who work in Oregon an exemption from paying tolls on the bridge, so the 65,000 Washingtonians who work across the river aren’t double taxed.

The reason: Washington residents who work across the Columbia River pay Oregon income tax, which at the top rate is nearly 10 percent, one of the highest in the nation.

Washingtonians “shouldn’t be double taxed simply for the benefit of going to work when they are already paying Oregon income tax,” he said.

The solution, said Rep. Sharon Wylie, D-Vancouver, is for there to be more jobs in Clark County — and, she said, the best way for that to happen is for the bridge to be built.

“I’ve thought long and hard over the years about how we could do something about this,” Wylie said. “We already have a whole lot of Oregon businesses moving into Clark County and providing jobs. By making sure our economic region is healthy, those jobs are going to be closer to people’s homes (so) they won’t have to be on the bridge unless they want to be on the bridge.”

Community Funded Journalism logo

This story was made possible by Community Funded Journalism, a project from The Columbian and the Local Media Foundation. Top donors include the Ed and Dollie Lynch Fund, Patricia, David and Jacob Nierenberg, Connie and Lee Kearney, Steve and Jan Oliva, The Cowlitz Tribal Foundation and the Mason E. Nolan Charitable Fund. The Columbian controls all content. For more information, visit columbian.com/cfj.

Loading...